“The Old Testament work of scholars like Gerhard von
Rad…(has) shown the deeply historical character of the biblical witness” (Jose
Miguez Bonino). Von Rad affirms that
ancient Israel’s covenant-prophetic theology was dynamically historical: its
world view was non-cyclical in contrast to that of the surrounding peoples of
the Fertile Crescent. It believed that
the Israelite people was constituted by a series of canonical or definitive
historical events and, particularly with the prophets, it was receptive and
responsive to new historical movements, changes and chances.
The covenant-prophetic faith believes that divinity
is actively involved in history. YHWH is
not primarily a god of the rich harvest or of fertility like Baal, who is
susceptible to the death and renewal cycles of the natural environment. Certainly, Yhwh is the creator of the
physical world and the guarantor of the continuance of the natural cycles. God favors these cycles not because he needs
to but because he wants to.
In contrast to the gods of the Fertile Crescent,
Yhwh’s will and power is revealed primarily in unrepeatable liberational events
like the Exodus and the conquest of Canaan.
“What distinguishes the Holy Spirit from the magic ‘spirits’ is that it
acts through historic mediations” (Miguez).
The biblical testimony to these liberational events
is meant to help normatively believers in every age to obey the contemporary
divine summons to help liberate and humanize people in their concrete
situations. The biblical message is
meant to inspire a humanizing praxis rather than to express propositions about
God’s being or essence. Miguez writes:
“The Biblical message is a call, an
announcement-proclamation (kerygma) which is given in order to put in motion
certain actions and to produce certain situations…God is not the content of the
message but the wherefrom and the whereto, the originator and the impulse of
this course of action and these conditions…By defining an event as God’s
action, the Bible is…pointing to the divinely wrought and revealed background
and power of the human action demanded.” (“Marxist Critical Tools”).
Not even in the revelation of the divine name to
Moses (Exodus 3:14) was an ontological statement intended; the divine name
could be understood only in the light of liberational events that would still
occur. In this way, the holy name has
done justice to divine freedom, which coincides with the gracious plan to save human
beings through human intermediaries.
Miguez firmly believes in “the reality of a God who ever remains
gratuitously ‘himself’ in the very process of being totally ‘for us’ and ‘in us’”
(“Historical Praxis”).
Miguez’s biblical theology recognizes that the covenant-prophetic
faith is not essentially an intellectual assent to revealed, supernatural and
timeless truths. Biblical faith is
neither speculative knowledge nor a passive contemplation of abstract
axioms. Instead, “faith is always a
concrete obedience” (Miguez), an obedient knowing, and an efficacious
realization of the divine summons, which is actively involved in biblical and
post-biblical history.
Authentic faith is an attentive knowledge of God’s
historical summons, and requires a concrete engagement with history. The biblical faith is a practising faith, a practical
form of knowing the active Word. “Faith
is like the strength of a muscle: we are only aware of it when we use it. The only faith is in the performance of the
faith.” (Miguez)
Miguez’s understanding of faith affirms that it is
both a divine gift and a human response.
God inaugurated history, and continues to be active in it. God’s historical activity calls us to
faithful practice, a concrete obedience to the living Word. The pre-condition for every faithful practice
is the reality of the prior divine commands and actions.
No comments:
Post a Comment